Knowledge Base
这里把网站上的产品信息、AI search visibility 概念、工具区别、credits、报告指标、方法论、隐私和常见排错集中到一个帮助中心里，适合第一次了解产品，也适合跑完报告后回来查具体含义。
Tools
Health Check is a deep assessment of whether a business is organized well enough for AI systems to understand, verify, recommend, and cite it.
A normal visibility run asks whether AI mentions or recommends the business. Health Check asks whether the owned website, entity signals, pages, and public evidence give AI systems enough reliable material to understand and verify it.
The overview keeps the result readable: one readiness score, the evidence counts behind it, three diagnostic dimensions, and the most important findings. It is a current evidence-based view rather than a permanent rating.
匿名的 Health Check 总览。商家身份已经移除，画面保留真实的报告结构和证据层级。
查看原尺寸图片整体 readiness 快照
这是基于当前可验证证据得出的状态，不是永久评级。
证据覆盖与可信度
来源数量、已验证事实、外部提及和冲突共同说明分数的依据。
三个 readiness 维度
Identity、Recommendation 和 Citation 分开呈现，最弱环节一眼就能找到。
按优先级整理的发现
报告把已验证的公开证据整理成可以继续行动的重点。
The report pairs each important issue with a practical action rather than leaving the user with a diagnostic label. Impact, effort, and the expected result make the recommendation easier to sequence.
This public example is anonymized, but it preserves the real relationship between the evidence gap and the action the business can take next.
同一条证据缺口从诊断直接连接到 30 天行动计划。
查看原尺寸图片先明确具体问题
Priority Issue 说明当前证据缺口以及它为什么影响机器理解。
把诊断变成行动
30-day plan 给出可以执行的下一步，而不是只留下低分。
行动成本和结果可预期
Impact、effort 与 expected result 帮助用户安排优先级。
Supporting evidence separates verified facts, agreement across observed sources, conflicts, and missing evidence. The score detail then shows which readiness dimensions are strong and which need attention.
Evidence coverage identifies the kinds of public sources that contributed to the assessment. The public walkthrough keeps those categories visible while removing business-identifying source details and internal scoring mechanics.
Supporting evidence 解释分数受到哪些公开证据支持，但不公开内部评分算法。
查看原尺寸图片证据可信度输入
Verified facts、AI consensus、conflicts 与 missing evidence 分开呈现。
分维度查看 readiness
Score details 让用户看到不同诊断维度的强弱，而不是只有一个总分。
证据覆盖与状态
来源条目保留 Likely、Confirmed 等证据状态；公开示例已移除业务身份。
A conflict is a concrete inconsistency in public evidence, not simply a low score. Health Check groups those inconsistencies separately and explains what should be verified before the next run.
The recheck guidance helps users avoid rerunning too early. It points to the conditions that should change first, such as clearer structured data, consistent outlet information, or a retrievable local profile.
品牌和负面事件细节已经移除，画面只保留冲突识别与复查逻辑。
查看原尺寸图片外部证据数量独立呈现
External mentions 说明可发现的公开参考数量，不等同于推荐数量。
冲突必须是具体矛盾
Conflict Findings 只列可以说明的公开不一致，不把缺失信息误叫作冲突。
先改变证据，再重新运行
When to recheck 说明哪些条件改善后，下一次 Health Check 才更有价值。
The final report converts evidence into priorities: which page to improve, what proof to add, and why the change may help AI systems recommend or cite the business more reliably.
The recommendations stay evidence-grounded rather than relying on generic templates, covering readiness diagnosis, owned asset coverage, conflict findings, priority actions, and a sensible point to recheck.